Ionization Chamber

An ionization chamber is a device used to measure radioactivity levels. When air atoms are hit by radioactive particles, an ion pair is produced. Ions have an electric charge, and if they are in an electric field created by positive and negative electrodes, negative ions will move toward the positive electrode, and positive ions will move toward the negative electrode. They will attempt to "meet each other," thereby creating a current. This current can be measured and is proportional to the number of ion pairs. The number of ion pairs is proportional to the radioactivity level.

The architecture of the device is presented below. It consists of an analog part and an STM8 microcontroller, which collects and sends measurements via UART. These measurements are collected on the Raspberry Pi side and processed using Python and R scripts. The results are stored as .csv files (raw data) or .png files (diagrams). While it would be possible to simplify this setup and eliminate the Raspberry Pi, I wanted to enable data collection and flashing of the microcontroller remotely, without needing to be physically near the device.

The outer electrode of the ionization chamber was made from PCB scraps and a copper plate, while the inner electrode was constructed using a few centimeters of non-enameled wire. To avoid electromagnetic interference, the amplifier was placed inside a metal chassis.

View on GitHub View on Hackaday

High voltage is required to create a sufficient electric field in the chamber. Initially, I was unsure of the exact voltage needed, so I added a simple DC/DC converter to the PCB to generate 400V DC. However, tests showed that 4x12V from batteries is sufficient. As a result, while the DC/DC converter is soldered onto the board (visible on the bottom left side of the picture), it is not in use.

The software was written in C and compiled using SDCC. A strange limitation of SDCC is that even if functions are unused, they are still compiled and included in the final binary. Since I am using StdPeriph as a HAL, there were many unused functions that occupied space. To work around this, I added #ifdef 0 ... #endif around each unused function, then attempted to compile and uncommented the functions that were actually needed.

The diagram below shows the results obtained from the device. As can be seen, the device is quite sensitive, capturing even small variations in the measurements.

For more details on the project, feel free to check out the full source code and documentation on GitHub. You can also follow the project's development and updates on Hackaday.

Read More

Camera nuclear-radiation sensor: part I

In previous posts I've described a radioactivity detector based on a photodiodes. Image sensors in cameras use photoelements too, so I think that they could be also used to detect radioactivity. At this moment i didn't success in this , nevertheless I will describe here my attempts.

I'm using RaspbberyPI, to get data from the sensor, camera is some low-budget/quality clone designed for RaspberryPI. I have removed optics, and covered whole camera in black tape to block any light coming to the sensor. It's visible on the picture below.

To handle the camera on the software side, I'm using Python script (with PiCamera library). In infinitive loop it takes a photo and calculate sum of pixels value and then sums values of each RGB channel. This value with timestamp is put to CSV file that is later parsed to diagrams using R script.

Without any sample, internal noise of the sensor (and maybe background radiation) should give after some time (e.g. after a couple of hours) a Gaussian curve on the histogram. After putting measured sample to the sensor and waiting similar period, a new Gaussian curve would appear, so that the histogram would have to visible peaks. That was my assumption, hit would prove that the sensor works, however as visible below it doesn't - there is only one peek.

I will try to better isolate the sensor also from electromagnetic noise or maybe buy a new camera (less noisy). Other than that I don't have ideas to make it works.

Read More

Semiconductor nuclear-radiation sensor: part III

In this post I will present a new hardware version of my sensor, older versions are described in part I and part II. In comparison to the previous one, sensitivity is roughly x10 more sensitive.

In previous version, tin foil window for photodiodes was very close to the BNC sockets and because enclosure was small, it was hard to place a sample close enough. Not it's better, however, if I would choosing again, I would use metal enclosure similar to those used in PC oscilloscopes and put BNCs on front panel, power socket on rear panel and tin foil window on top. This would allow me to easier access for debugging- now I have to desolder sockets to get to photodiodes or to bottom side of PCB (fortunately this side is empty).

Bellow you can see the diagram (click on it to enlarge), what has changed in comparison to previous version:

• One additional photodiode (previous version has only two of them) to increase sensitivity, also the window in enclosure is much bigger
• x10 bigger resistance of the feedback loop resistor in first stage amplifier, I tried bigger, but then osculations started
• Bias for photodiodes using 12V batteries, I could increase it, but didn't have enough space in this enclosure
• Buffer op-amp at the analog output
• Digital output.

Additional changes not shown on diagram:

• U1 is OPA657U
• U2 is OPA656U
• R4 is 1G
• As close as possible to input power socket are placed in paraller 1n/16V and 100n/16V, without them the device started to oscillate randomly.
• A Schottky diode is connected in series after mentioned above extra capacitors to reduce risk of damaging the device when power supply is connected incorrectly. I don't know if it will help enough but I have already broke one PCB of this device this way, so now it's there.

Digital output is 12V in high state, 0V in low state, this is not very useful for 3V3 logic microcontroller that I'm using for data acquisition, so I made a simple converter using additional PCB.

Here it is visible soldered. I like in those SMA Female sockets that they can be soldered to the edge of the PCB (as visible below) and this is still quite mechanically stable, but doesn't require to drill holes as in regular mounting way.

All materials (including software part presented in previous post) for this hardware revision can be downloaded from project's repository.

Read More

Semiconductor nuclear-radiation sensor: part II

There are many ways to measure radioactivity level, semiconductor detectors sense interactions between ionizing radiation and p-n junction. Because in hobbyist area most popular are Geiger-Muller based detectors (in short: not a semiconductor but lamp based devices), I think it's a cool idea to take a look at this approach.

In this post I will present such home-made sensor and a set of software to parse collected results.

Picture below presents circuit of the sensor that I made, it consist of a photodiode that acts as a sensor, transimpedance amplifier and "regular" amplifier. I've selected op-amps that has little input noise.

Changes that I made during testing the device, that are not presented on the diagram:

• D1 is BPW34
• U1 is OPA657U
• U2 is OPA656U
• 2p capacitor is connected in parallel with R6
• 820k resistor is connected between U2 out and BNC socket.

Below is visible sensor in enclosure and without it. Because the device is sensitive for background EMI and light noise, a metal housing is needed. To increase exposure of the sensor to the radiation, where it is, in the housing, a hole is made and just a tiny adhesive metal tape is covering it.

Read More

Raspberry Pi 3 nuclear-radiation monitoring station

Recently I've found Pi-GI, it's an open source project of a radiation monitoring system based on Raspberry Pi, and (open source hardware) Geiger-Muller detector. Statistics are available through a web page, so it's possible to use it conveniently on a PC, tablet or a phone. It's written in python.

Today I will present how I've glued together this software and my Geiger-Muller counter described in my previous posts.

Below is a circuit of my counter, it uses 5V power supply and draws a couple of mA, so it's possible to power it directly from Raspberry. Since originally I've used three tubes in parallel, I had to remove two of them to not have values multiplied by three - most of the detectors and software for them uses only one tube.

Raspberry Pi requires 3V3 logic on GPIO ports, fortunately, that's not a problem here, pin 3 of SV3 socket just needs to be connected to 3V3 rail on the Raspberry Pi. The output (pin 2 of the same socket) needs to be connected to one of the GPIO pins. It's a bit confusing, because on the webpage the circuit states that GPIO0 is used, but in the current version of the software GPIO4 is used instead. The pin can be configured in software by editing gpio_port variable in PiGI/software/conf/default.cfg

Software installation and configuration is presented in this article, in addition, because I use STS-5 tubes, I had to change the tube type in PiGI/software/conf/default.cfg - SBM-20 has almost the same parameters as STS-5.

 60 # See: https://apollo.open-resource.org/lab:pigi:common-geiger-tube-parameter
 61 tube_id = SBM-20
 62
 63 # GM tube specific cpm to microsievert/h conversion factor
 64 tube_rate_factor = 0.00277

Application starts by default on 8080 port, so logs are available by the web on http:/[IP of the Raspberry Pi]:8080 address. By default it starts in simulation mode, to change it and get real values, it's needed to change in http://[IP of the Raspberry Pi]:8080/webGI/index.html#serverOptionsPanel source to "environment".

That was all, now I'm able to monitor radioactivity just from my browser!

On the picture above, you may see an increased radioactivity level, I've placed smoke detector containing a radioisotope of americium on the GM tube, at the end is visible big decrease, this is because I've taken the smoke detector out, so only environmental radiation was present.

The value drops to 20-25 pulses per minute, that's normal value for environmental radioactivity - it's mentioned in the tube datasheet.

Read More

Nuclear-radiation detection using very simple ionization chamber and a single J-FET transistor

Today I will show a very simple ionization chamber that can detect radioactivity. I was able to detect with it ionizing radiation from a smoke detector (Am²⁴¹ isotope). It's also immune to electromagnetic interference (EMI) due to a good shielding.

This device doesn't explicitly use any power supply. It's connected to a multimeter set to measure resistance, in this mode, the multimeter provides a small voltage to its probes (R=I/U, so to measure resistance, it has to put voltage across measured element). This is sufficient here, because basically we just need to polarise electrodes of the ionization chamber and nothing more. My multimeter provides 5.6V in this mode.

My setup is presented below, note that the sensor is this metal box, not the PCB visible on the image.

The chamber is made from copper plate soldered carefully to prevent any holes where electromagnetic fields could flow and disturb readings. Inside is one BF256B (n-channel J-FET) transistor, its gate is connected to one of ionization chamber plate made from a leg of a THT resistor, source pin is available externally, this is where "plus" probe of the DMM is connected, drain is connected to the metal case (that is both and electrode and is shielded against EMI).

I've used Keysight 34460A as a multimeter here, because it has histogram mode, that will be useful to look if the measured value is stable over time. PLC was set to 0.2, it will reduce accuracy, but will give much more samples.

Below two images present what is inside of the sensor (only JFET, as mentioned above) and the sensor mounted. The front was shielded using tin foil, that was secured tightly by insulation tape.

There are many movies on YouTube with people constructing ionization chambers, however, those aren't shielded completely and due to high wideband gain in those circuits, they will pick-up any electromagnetic radiation, so the results aren't very useful.

Those designs measures not only ionizing radiation, but also whole electromagnetic spectrum. Here I tried as a dummy test to place the a metal object to check if the measured value won't change, without a shielding it would probably be a big peak.

Time to show results. The resistance decreases when the amount of ionizing radiation increases, below you can see two peaks on the histogram, one on the left is when the sample (Am²⁴¹ isotope) is present next to the sensor, on the right, when there is no sample.

I think, that it's a very interesting circuit, and can be used for example to understand how different shielding prevents radioactive radiation, etc. It's limited, but a good start to making own ionizing chambers.

Read More

Nuclear physic applied in smoke detectors

Not many people know, but in some smoke detectors, radioactive materials play an essential role. Today I will present one of those devices, and my -successful- attempt to reverse engineer it and get the circuit diagram.

Those smoke detectors use a small amount of Americium-241 (chemical symbol: Am) obtained in nuclear reactors as a decay product of Plutonium-241. Am²⁴¹ emits mainly alpha particles, but also some gamma rays. In smoke detectors it is in a form of an oxide Am0₂.

When alpha particles collide with atoms in the air, as a result, ions are produced. The amount of those ions is measured by smoke detector and is quite stable over time (Am²⁴¹ has half-life of 432 years), however, when the smoke is present, smoke particles neutralise alpha particles, so the measured value drops. This drop is the signal of fire, so the smoke detectors start buzzer to alert people in the building.

To measure those ions (produced by ionizing radiation), ionization chamber is used. It has a form of two differently charged plates shaped and placed in such distance that the ionizing radiation can flow between them.

Those plates, when charged, create an electric field that attracts those ions. When they are collected by plates, and additional voltage is created between plates, this voltage can be measured. The bigger this additional voltage, the bigger is the ionizing radiation.

When those smoke detectors are used as designed, they don't pose a radioactive hazard, however, if those devices are disassembled, it must be done with great care. Alpha particle sources (as used here) are very dangerous if they came into the lungs in a form of dust. They are also dangerous if digested.

On below image, you can see the ionization chamber. It's connected in the air directly to the pin of the chip to avoid parasitic currents flowing on the PCB. This is because voltages created by ionization chambers are very low. Radioactive element is inside of the ring.

To be honest, I think that the PCB could be routed much better - angles of traces should be 45° if possible.

As was visible on previous pictures, ionization chamber is soldered directly above the chip that runs this device. I wanted to know what is this chip, but didn't want to solder off the ionization chamber, that's why I reverse engineered this PCB into electronic circuit and later found an online datasheet of the chip that fits here. My works are visible below.

After searching, I have found RE46C120 datasheet, so now I was pretty sure it's this chip. Just to be sure, I checked on the oscilloscope, what signal is on the TP3 and how it looks on the datasheet - it's the same.

That's basically all for today, I wanted to share with you the idea of those pretty interesting devices.

Read More

Semiconductor Nuclear-Radiation Sensor: Part I

Currently I'm trying to make a working version of a radioactivity detector that uses semiconductor as a sensor. It's a different approach than Geiger-Muller detectors or ionization chambers, more complicated, but also much more interesting.

While Geiger-Muller counters can only provide information about the amount of particles in a period of time, semiconductor detectors can also measure their energy, so it's possible to say much more about the nature of observed ionizing radiation. Some of the disadvantages of these detectors are that they are more expensive, complex and sensitivity may degrade over time.

The current version doesn't work, but I think it's so interesting concept that I've written this entry anyway.

The idea is that when ionizing particle (alpha, beta or gamma) is blocked by the p-n junction, a small amount of the energy is released. It has a form of a current spike and can be observed by the next stages of the device.

The p-n junction is just a diode polarized reverse-biased. To make the working area of the p-n junction bigger, a photodiode is used. I know that there also exists specialized versions that are more sensitive, however, I couldn't find any in any online electronic shops.

In my design, the sensor is D1, it's polarized by R1, and C1, R2, L1 (those last three elements are making a low band filter to block noise from power supply, they should be as close to D1 as possible).

The first stage of an amplifier is based on a N-JFET to minimize current sink from the measured circuit, in addition, this type of transistors are extremely fast (that's why they are used widely in RF designs). To reduce parasitic currents between PCB traces, this part is mounted "in the air". EMI that could affect this stage are reduced by a small mass connected shield made from copper and aluminium tape.

Next two steps are high pass amplifiers. Since the signal is very small and those are not rail-to-rail opamps, a symmetrical power supply or virtual mass should be used. I've forgotten about that so lately I just used additional AA battery connected between negative power pin of the opamp and ground.

There are three outputs: raw, high/low (R10, R11, IC1C) and integrated over a period of time (IC1D, R12, R13, R14, C9, C10).

Below image shows the sensor, I've removed the protective glass from the photodiode to expose it better on the ionizing radiation.

The PCB looks like a nightmare because I've scratched some pads during multiple soldering and desoldering of elements, also some traces were cut and connected again, etc. It's a big blow of a mess now and I think that the story of this PCB is ended, soon I will design a new one based on the experience I've gained.

As I've said in the beginning of the article, the current version doesn't work - I can't observe anything except noise. This may be due to multiple problems. One of them is a proper shielding, tracks length, etc. It's a challenge to shield the device from EMI, but still make it sensitive to ionizing radiation.

Another problem is that I can test it only with alpha or beta particles, but they have big problems penetrating objects (are easily blocked), so it may be that they aren't even going to the pn junction, but are blocked by the case. This is something that is unclear to me at this moment.

I will continue working on this project and write a new article when I will make some progress.

Read More

Using Arduino to process data from Geiger–Müller counters

In the previous posts I've described a simple Geiger–Müller counter and various experiments with this device. Today I would like to present Arduino project to communicate with a Geiger-Muller counter, gather data and present it to the user. The device is based on Arduino Uno, Nokia 5110 LCD and homemade shield.

Currently it's possible to show two layouts: bar graph of the pulses in one minute interval and histogram of the gathered data. Both graphs are auto-ranging in Y axis. On the top of the pulse graph is visible also a numeric value of the last sample. The length of the histogram data is 4 minutes, the amount of bins is calculated automatically.

Below is visible layout with pulses per quant of time and histogram of them. You can clearly observe Gaussian distribution on the second image.

Hardware

I didn't want to place all of the connections and input PCB dimensions of a shield, so I've used as a base one of freely available shields and modified it to my needs - I've left the licence disclaimer unmodified. Unfortunately, I wrongly connected LCD, that's why the LCD looks like rotated 180 degrees. Anyway, it still works and I don't plan to make a new PCB to fix it.

I tried to make the code reusable in my other projects so the structure may look overcomplicated, but I think it's as it should be.

Software

Followed 3rd party librairies needs to be installed, to install them in Arduino IDE go to sketch -> Include Library -> Manage Libraries then type library name and proceed with installation.

• Adafruit-GFX-Library
• Adafruit-PCD8544-Nokia-5110-LCD-library

The main component is the GMCounter class that collects data in a circular buffer. I wanted to pass as an argument a size of the buffer, but also wanted to avoid using dynamic memory, finally I made this parameter an argument of template class, so now creating an object of this class looks like:

 static GMCounter<4 * 24> hourGMCounter;

This will create an object with this class with a buffer for 4*24 samples. I think, that it's quite cool.

There's a lot of commented out code in the main function, it was used to test parts of the program as it was developed. I didn't remove it because it still can be used if I will add new features.

Download.

The source code and Eagle files of the project is available on the GitHub, feel free to download and try it if you're interested in this area of physic.

Read More

DP-70 dosimeter

DP-70 was a chemical dosimeter used in the Polish army during the Cold War. A dosimeter is a device used to measure the amount of radioactive radiation absorbed by a body, in this case, by soldiers.

DP-70 has a form of a small metal cylinder (to protect the device in hard, combat conditions) that covers an ampule with a transparent liquid. This substance change color proportionally to absorbed radioactive radiation.

It's a simple device, but has two major drawbacks - it can't be used by colorblind persons and is not precise. Due to those two factors, the device was replaced by more modern DKP-50 dosimeter.

It can be bought for around two euro, unfortunately it's designed to measure ranges present during nuclear war, so it's far too insensitive to make any experiments with environmental radioactivity.

Read More

Measuring nuclear-radiation of potassium from cigarette ashes

In the previous post I've presented a simple way of extraction compounds from ashes, today I will measure radioactivity of obtained sample by using my homemade Geiger counter. Below is a quick view of the setup that I used.

Read More

Extracting potassium (with its radioisotope) from cigarette ashes

Organisms are built mainly of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen, but they use many more chemical elements, one of them is potassium. After burning of organic matter, potassium stays in ashes as oxide that later is transformed to hydroxide. In the environment, potassium exists in a mixture of three isotopes: 93.3% of 39 K, 6,7% of 41 K, and 0,012% of radioisotope 40 K. The amount of mentioned 40 K radioisotope is really tinny, but sufficient to be detected using home methods.

In this post I will present a simple method to extract potassium compounds from ashes. Purity of the end product is low, from what I found online, for wood ashes, it's around 20-30%.

What is needed? Cigarette ash (for this experiment I used remains of 192 cigarettes - I'm a smoker!), water (can be tap water), stove, pot, two beakers (or jars), funnel, cotton, stirrer (or spoon). The whole process takes a couple of hours.

I've started from removing cigarette buts, matches, and other junks, the result was ~130ml of ashes.

Read More

A trip with Geiger Counter on the Śnieżka mountain

During the Second World War Nazis established a uranium mine in Krkonoše mountains. Extracted ore was used in a research facility in Oranienburg. After the war, the mine was in polish borders, but Poland was then a puppy country of the USSR, so the ore was still extracted, but now was transported to the USSR. Later the mine was used in civil research.

I've visited those mountains with my Geiger counter, not the mine, but still close - Śnieżka mountain.

My construction uses three GM tubes instead of one - that's why the amount of pulses per period of time is also three times bigger. Don't panic! :) In addition, even if radioactivity is a bit bigger that in (for example) my home in Wroclaw, it's still not hazardous for health.

As a reference, at home my Geiger Counter shows around 60 pulses per minute.

As you will see below results were bigger than those that I observe at home, is it due to the uranium ore that is near? Maybe, I'm not sure, I wasn't on any other mountains with my counter, so I can't verify it.

Preparations

32F429IDISCOVERY board is used to count pulses and show results, it requires 5V power supply, the same as my Geiger Counter. Both were supplied from DC/DC converter (the cheapest I could buy), and 3xAA NiCd batteries. In total 250-300mA was drained from the batteries.

Final adjustments of the latest HW version - as usual, I made mistakes during the design of the PCB.

Read More

DKP-50 dosimeter (radioactivity detector) tear-down

DKP-50 was a dosimeter produced for the Polish People's Army during the cold war era. It indicates amount of radioactivity absorbed by the body, a soldier was equipped in this device in case of nuclear conflict. A scale has range of 0-50R (R = Roentgen, a legacy unit of exposure of X-rays and gamma rays). 500R in 5h is usually lethal.

It's based on ionizing chamber that changes radioactivity radiation to an electric current, current discharges a capacitor that is also used as a power source. The device measures discharge of a capacitor over time. This is done by using a wire that accordingly changes its position and optic unit to make those results available for the operator.

If you're interested in radioactivity, you may also want to read about a Geiger–Müller Counter that I've made.

Sample result is visible on the picture. Note that it's inaccurate because the device was discharged and wasn't calibrated.

The deice, visible a plastic cap (with seal) to protect charging electrodes and a metal clip to attach the device to an uniform. On the cap, there're two names: "DKP-50" and "12".

Read More

Modular DIY Geiger–Müller counter

The Geiger–Müller counter is a relatively simple tool to measure ionizing radiation. To increase sensitivity, construction presented here contains three (instead of one as usually) soviet STS-5 lamps. This is important for measurements of natural sources of (low) radiation like soil, rocks (an article about my trip with Geiger–Müller counter on Śnieżka mountain).

Principle of operation of a Geiger–Müller counter

When high voltage (typically 380-420V) is applied to the Geiger–Müller tube, the tube doesn't conducts electricity, but it does conducts for a short period, when radiation particle is observed. Those pulses are observed by the detector. The level of ionizing radiation is proportional to the amount of pulses detected in a constant interval of time (typically from 20s to 2,5min).

Geiger–Müller tube behavior can be described as a "button", that is "pushed" by an ionizing particle.

Let's go further into the details. Geiger–Müller tube is made of two electrodes, ionizing particle creates a spark gap between them, to reduce amount of current that flows in this situation, a resistor is put in series with the tube. Marked as R1 on above circuit, R6 on below. Typically it's in a range 1-10M, acceptable values are listed in documentation of the GM tube.

There are a different ways to obtain a signal from the tube, in presented here, a resistor is connected in series between the tube and ground, changes of the voltage on the resistor are measured by the detector. This resistor is marked as R2 on above diagram, R7 on below. Typically it's in a range 10-220k.

Similarly to diode, a Geiger–Müller tube has its polarity, when connected in the opposite direction it will work incorrectly.

Below is shown a signal from GM tube when a particle is detected.

The electronic circuit of a Geiger–Müller counter

MC34063 is a DC/DC converter used to produce required high voltage, one of it's advantage over a simple NE555 or similar generators in this circuit is that it can monitor the output voltage and adjusts parameters to make it stable (R3, R4, R5, C3).

IC1A, R8, R9 are used as a comparator to filter out noises and produce binary signal (low=no pulse at this moment, high=pulse is currently being observed). R10, R11, R12 and a bunch of transistors drives LED, a speaker and (as an option) external digital devices, e.g. Arduino, or other evaluation board.

Waring! The device uses high voltage and can lead to unpleasant shock, injury or death. Don't touch the PCB or tubes when power is on.

Read More